Text: Colinvaux,
P. (1978). Why big fierce animals are rare: An ecologist's perspective.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Text Frames:
Cause/Effect and Concept/Definition
Strategy
used and resource: Science Connection overview (Buehl 2014)
Out
of the long list of guiding comprehension activities in our text, the natural
choice for my next assignment was the science connection overview (Buehl 2014).
This strategy involves having the students work with a partner to preview a
chapter and fill out a worksheet by first writing down the words and phrases
that seem familiar to them. They then look for material that has already been covered
and take notes on that. Using the past two questions and what they have picked
up in the skimming, they then formulate questions that may be answered in the
text. Finally, they predict what the author will try to convey in the reading.
This strategy is great for difficult readings and, depending on how the class receives
this activity for Why Big Fierce Animals
are Rare, I may use the same activity for peer-reviewed journals as well.
I am excited to use this
strategy in the upcoming assignment of this particular reading, mostly because
the students were given a previous chapter from this book and struggled with
it. The chapter is focused on the ocean, and while it gives great examples of
why the ocean is a less efficient ecosystem than a terrestrial system, the
author assumes that the reader has a good grasp on basic ecology at this point
in the book (it is chapter 9). Before reading, the activity required me to skim
through the chapter to look for phrases and ideas that were familiar to me
before I read the chapter. Quickly looking through the paragraphs, I jotted
down anything that my students have already covered this year. Even doing that,
had me less nervous about assigning this reading. Next, without going back to
the text, I used the previous questions to formulate what questions this
chapter may be asking. This is interesting because if there are some questions
that students ask that are not answered in the chapter, we may be able to have
an extended discussion for deeper learning. Finally, I took a guess as to what
the author may try to answer in the ten pages of the chapter.
When I finally go to
reading the chapter, I was able to organize my thoughts and was able to highlight
much more efficiently than when I had read previous chapters from this book. I
think that I would like to do this activity in class and then assign the
reading for home, and ask for annotations. A follow up discussion could be
framed around whether or not students’ questions were answered and whether or
not their predictions were correct about the author.
Below are the science connection questions and the
notes I took before reading.
What’s familiar? Skim the chapter for things that are
familiar and that connect with your life and world.
- Deserts have low nutrients
- Calories
- Productivity
- Measuring plant tissue
- Nutrient cycles
- Dams
- Pollution
- Rule of tens
- Food chains
- Overfishing
What topics are covered? After skimming, what seem to
be the main ideas of this reading?
- · Productivity in the ocean
- · Nutrients in the ocean
What are you wondering? What questions do you have
about the material that may be answered in the chapter?
- · Why aren’t there a lot of nutrients in the ocean?
- · Where do the nutrients come from?
- · How does the sea life get the few nutrients?
- What will the author tell you? What is the structure of this reading?
- · Ocean is a desert
- · There is not a lot of plant life
- · Nutrient cycles in the ocean
- · Humans taking food from ocean is bad
Buehl, D. (2014). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (4th ed.). Newark, DE. International Reading Association
Ted, I really like this idea but i wonder if students would read the whole chapter after skimming it or if they would just skim for the information they need. Right now I have a hard time getting my students to read anything that is more than a page long. If though I have this concern I really like the idea of having students look through a chapter purely to find information which they already know. I think this would be helpful because it would show students that everything they learned before wasn't for nothing and that it is still connected to what they are learning now. I think this is something I would consider using with my the chemistry textbook.
ReplyDeleteDani,
DeleteI actually thought about that as well. The kids could go through and just highlight the parts they had already found when I check for notations. Ideally, when I am going through the discussion during the next class, I can use the section on questions asked to see if the students read enough to answer those questions.
Ted, I really like this guided comprehension strategy. I feel that this would be very useful for me as a math teacher who is looking to add more opportunities to improve student literacy throughout the course. I think this strategy could be used with either textbook notes or even a video that is assigned for homework like Khan Academy. The one disadvantage of making this homework for videos would be making sure that students follow the directions, which could be a problem. All in all, I think you picked a great strategy for the article and hopefully it goes well as a classroom lesson.
ReplyDelete